Friday, April 6, 2012

Racism and Roque's Own Racism

Filipino lawyer Harry Roque
Atty. Harry Roque is probably one of the most well-known lawyers in the country. And this is partly due to his being chikadora. The legal eagle always has something to say on issues, especially political ones. One of my amigas (classmate ko sa cooking class), calls Atty. Roque as super eksenadora.

True enough, whenever there are controversial issues, expect to see Roque's chubby face na nakabalandra sa tv screen. Maguindanao massacre, MOA-AD, electoral fraud, Corona impeachment. Sometimes, nakakaumay na din ang pagmumukha ng hitad. hihihi

Chikadora kung chikadora siya. So I was surprised to read yesterday a news about his crying foul over what he considered as racism. He even twitted:

"Was a victim of racism in LA. Hard to think that whites still feel superior in a city that's already predominantly Asian!"

Curiously, for a chikadora like him, the specific circumstances were not given.

Even news reports were kinda vague about what really happened. As of posting time, GMA News Online wrote that "Further details on where, when, and how the incident happened were not immediately available."

I turned to his blog, nada.

Anyway, what surprised me was Roque's tweets. He claimed to be a victim of racism but the words he used in his tweets amount to racism. I dunno with you guys, but for me, referring to an ethnic group by the color of the skin is racism, itself!

Not content with his 'racist" tweet, Roque added that it was "awful" that he and his family were treated like a "pariah by a bigoted caucasian."

Can someone please tell me if Roque's tweets are not racist? Unconsciously, Roque himself committed racism.

And just what he meant by "a city that's already predominantly Asian?" Such statement is irresponsible. Does he mean that "whites" be subservient to Asians?

For Roque's information, below is the cultural of Los Angeles based on the 2010 United States Census:

Whites: 29.4%
Hispanics or Latinos: 48.5%
African-Americans: 9.8%
Native Americans: 0.5%
Asians: 10.7%
Pacific Islanders: 0.2%
Some other race: 25.2%
Two or more races: 2.8%

So nasaan diyan ang sinasabi niya na Asians comprise the majority in Los Angeles?

I would understand how Roque felt had he told the whole story. It is wrong to claim that he was a victim of racism when he did not gave details. It is typical of Filipino politicking - accusing someone of wrongdoing without substantiating the accusation. Case in point, that of CJ Corona.

Who knows baka napangitan lang sa kanya yung Amerikano. If this was the case, then it's not racial discrimination but facial discrimination, di ba? hihihi

6 comments:

  1. Ang hula ko, he is disproportionately blowing up a very small incident, para mapag-usapan lang siya. Note that he doesn't dare relate the details of the so-called incident - the reason being, kung maamoy ng U.S.Immigration that he is creating fire when there is none, he can be DEPORTED. Now, THAT would be something...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nagbakasyon lang sa america namintas pa, pakayabang nito. ano akala mo trato kang special sa america, ungas. pangit mo. di pwede balat sibuyas sa america

      Delete
  2. a ha ha ha ha!!! nakita siguro yung wig nya. sagwa!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Liparin sana ang toupee niya! hihihi

    ReplyDelete
  4. from the first time I saw this guy on tv, inayawan ko na ang taong ito! my instincts were right - siya pala ay isang male version ni lie de lima!

    ReplyDelete